CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote operation

To: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>, Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote operation
From: Trent Sampson <vk4ts@outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 21:25:27 +0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Greetings All 

I am a bit confused here - as it appears are many others 

Assume I am a visitor to the USA and a contest operator asks me to join a multi 
op station. I do not have a USA callsign what you are saying is I cannot join 
in as I need to have a US callsign to operate the station under the supervision 
of the control op? 

Is that how it is meant to work? Are you saying any operation by a Multi op 
from any location without all ops having local call signs should be 
disqualified?  It would be a long list 

73

Trent VK4TS


-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Ria 
Jairam
Sent: Thursday, 8 June 2017 2:27 AM
To: Stan Stockton
Cc: cq-contest@contesting.com; W4AAW@aol.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote operation

I don't have a problem with remote contesting either, as long as it is done 
legally and ethically.

The legality under CEPT for US operations at best is undetermined.
ARRL regulatory has one opinion which says that it is not. Individuals have 
other opinions. What I do not see here is the FCC saying whether it is legal or 
not.

There is also a potential violation of US regulations if foreign operators 
exceed the power and frequency limits of their home license.
Despite what W5OV says, Part 97, specifically 97.107 is extremely clear about 
this. The operating terms and conditions of the home license must be observed. 
This includes power and frequency limits.

The ethics, well that is up to an individual and their conscience.

73
Ria, N2RJ

On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com> wrote:
> Totally out of line!
>
> 73...Stan, K5GO
>
> Sent from Stan's IPhone
>
>
>
>> On Jun 7, 2017, at 10:18 AM, W4AAW@aol.com via CQ-Contest 
>> <cq-contest@contesting.com> wrote:
>>
>> Paul, EI5DI, says he  knows that most or all remote operations are running 
>> "unattended.". Well, how can he know this?
>>
>> He surmises it because he suffers from a visceral hatred of any remote 
>> operation.
>>
>> My station is  certainly is NOT unattended during contests.  I am at the 
>> station for the full duration of any contest we enter.
>>
>> I am the Control Operator at all times.
>>
>> Precious Paul, we are getting a little tired of your exaggerated and 
>> often, inaccurate and baseless observations about remote contesting
>>
>> We all get it: Paul hates remote operation.   We also get that remote 
>> contesting is here to stay.  If is a burgeoning niche within contesting.
>>
>> Mediocre contesters who try to peddle a third or fourth rate app, to the 
>> uninformed are not to be taken seriously.  Does any top ten station use 
>> contesting software from Ireland?
>>
>> Thought not.
>>
>> Mike W4AAW
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>