CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Rule Change for Remote Ops - Always Multi-op?

To: k9yc <k9yc@arrl.net>, cq-contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>, Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Rule Change for Remote Ops - Always Multi-op?
From: Mark van Wijk <pa5mw@home.nl>
Reply-to: Mark van Wijk <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 12:18:41 +0200 (CEST)
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Which I understand and respect.
Local RF noise here too is a major bitch.
So is my neighbors wife.

But during the contests the operator should travel to the remote site and put
his but in that chair.

No remote operating during contests, OR would you say it is NOT tempting to do
illegal local RX on your FD4, work zillions of mults on Lowbands and pretend to
be listening from remote site cross-continent only?

Similar to "Europeans telling they do not exceed 1K5" but recently all upgraded
to the "more reliable xx-4000".
Oh wait, that's another discussion. 
And hams do not cheat.

73 Mark PA5MW


> Op 31 juli 2017 om 18:27 schreef Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>:

> 
> may be using a station remotely (maybe even one they have built, and 
> even built the remote control system for) BECAUSE where they live is 
> surrounded by RF noise! Or because deed restrictions prohibit antennas.
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Rule Change for Remote Ops - Always Multi-op?, Mark van Wijk <=