CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Raw scores for WW CW

To: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>, cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Raw scores for WW CW
From: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 10:33:42 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
What would be even more interesting is to know what physical setup they were using - I'm sort of betting on a multi-multi (at least 6 transmitters) with interlocks to stay within the rules for multi-single.

73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the Reverse Beacon Network
at <http://reversebeacon.net>, now
spotting RTTY activity worldwide.
For spots, please use your favorite
"retail" DX cluster.

On 12/6/2017 9:48 AM, john@kk9a.com wrote:
It is interesting that Multi-Single is the highest scoring category.  The
top entries have higher scores and any of the Multi-Two and Multi-Multi
stations.

John KK9A


To:     <cq-contest@contesting.com>
From:   "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net>
Reply-to:       k5zd@charter.net
Date:   Wed, 6 Dec 2017 07:52:53 -0500

I see the raw scores for CQ WW CW 2017 have appeared on the web site.

http://www.cqww.com/raw.htm?mode=cw


Randy K5ZD

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>