| To: | Charles Harpole <hs0zcw@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Amplifier ratings nomenclature |
| From: | Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net> |
| Date: | Fri, 29 Dec 2017 10:44:37 -0600 |
| List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
> > An amp can be called 100% ICAS by imaginative advertising writers, but that > number is definitely not CCS. > It’s interesting the abuse of English that consumers will let marketing bullshi##ers get away with… 100 per cent intermittent… Right… 73, kelly, ve4xt _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmers, antennas, power, competitors, Ria Jairam |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Canada Winter Contest - Dec 30, 2017., Sean Waite |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Amplifier ratings nomenclature, Ranko Boca |
| Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Skimmers, antennas, power, competitors, José Nunes CT1BOH |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |