I agree that the serial number is not as important as the correct exchange.
Log checking software should be able to handle SO2R.
73 Dave K4JRB
-----Original Message-----
>From: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
>Sent: Jan 23, 2018 1:03 PM
>To: cq-contest@contesting.com
>Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] HA DX Contest Log Checking Software
>
>I use Writelog and this serial number issue is a common occurrence with
>that software also. Most contests do not care what the sequence is, just
>that the copied exchange matches what was sent.
>
>John KK9A
>
>
>To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
>Subject: [CQ-Contest] HA DX Contest Log Checking Software
>From: "Bud Trench" <aa3b.bud@gmail.com>
>Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 11:14:15 -0500
>
>I submitted my HA DX log and received a report from the HA1AH Contest
>Evaluator Software. It included numerous error messages as follows:
>
>
>
>"QSO_ERROR_SENT_NUMBER_ORDER_ERROR: The sent serial number is equals or
>lower than the previous one."
>
>
>
>This commonly occurs when doing SO2R and using N1MM Logger+ which reserves
>serial numbers by entry window. I do not believe this is an error
>condition.
>
>
>
>Five multipliers were lost as a result of the above "error" condition. I
>have sent a message to MRASZ asking that this be changed and I would ask
>other HA DX contest participant to consider making a similar request.
>
>
>
>73 and SZIA
>
>
>
>Bud AA3B
>
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|