CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] WSJT-X For contests - Dry Run

To: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] WSJT-X For contests - Dry Run
From: Maarten van R <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 15:52:39 +0200
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Dave,

I fully agree. It’s too bad that so many focus only on the negatives.

Fortunately it really helps a lot to bitch and moan about our evolving
hobby on reflectors like this one. Otherwise it would be completely
pointless, hi.

73, Maarten PD2R


Op do 25 okt. 2018 om 14:10 schreef David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>

>
> What do you care what the data modes are evolving into if you don't use
> them (even RTTY) and they don't affect the CW and SSB contests that you
> do use?
>
> I don't get it.  Amateur radio is thankfully a lot broader than your
> definition of it, and for the most part manages to keep the various
> modes segregated enough to satisfy everyone.   It makes zero sense to
> bitch about what other people do if they aren't negatively affecting
> you.  That doesn't make you old, or outdated ... it makes you a bigot.
>
> "Bigot: A /bigot/ is a prejudiced person who is intolerant of any
> opinions differing from their own."
>
> Dave   AB7E
>
>
>
> On 10/23/2018 1:50 PM, Paul O'Kane wrote:
> > As we move ever closer to fully-automated data modes, the divide
> > between data and
> > non-data modes gets bigger.  When and if the operator becomes
> > incidental, what will
> > be the point of such contest QSOs - other than bragging that my
> > software is smarter
> > than yours?
> >
> > WSJT-X may be the "flavour of the month" now - but, next month, or
> > certainly next
> > year, something "better" will turn up - as the potential for "new and
> > improved" data
> > modes is limitless.  Some see this as progress in amateur radio and
> > contesting - I see
> > it as progress in automated two-way data processing over RF.
> >
> > It seems to me that any mode that is not and can not be decoded by
> > individual
> > contesters (people) in real-time does not truly represent amateur
> > radio.  But what
> > would  I know, being just an old-fashioned (outdated?) contester who
> > keeps to
> > phone and CW :-)
> >
> > Some will argue that we have to keep up, we can't stop progress, and
> > that amateur
> > radio and contesting are evolving.  I say that data modes are evolving
> > into something
> > else entirely.
> >
> > 73,
> > Paul EI5DI
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>