CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Re-Build - Coax

To: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>, charlie carroll <k1xx@k1xx.com>, "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Re-Build - Coax
From: Wayne Kline <w3ea@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 13:24:49 +0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Pete,

I am holding in my hand two manufacturs   M17/128   RG-400  MR -C-17G 12814   
Thermax RGS 400     and  ALPHA   MIL-C-17/1288 M17/128-RG 400

There  Not supple   stiff ,   not flexable like RG8X  .   The cable  is STIFF  
but can be bent in to a 2” dia loop. At  1 “ can be done but IMO  not a good  
practice.
The 8” in coil   YIKES that’s stiff ?

YMMV

Wayne W3EA

Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10

________________________________
From: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2019 8:48:38 AM
To: Wayne Kline; charlie carroll; cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Re-Build - Coax


Oops.  I did some more dissecting on the cable, and I'm wrong about the 
shielding.  That leaves only the absence of printing - this is advertised as 
Harbour Industries RG-400 - and its stiffness.  This stuff is quite hard to 
bend in even an 8" coil.  Can anyone who has used real RG-400 confirm whether 
it feels supple and flexible to the touch?  I have one jumper in my station 
that looks like the same stuff, but which is very supple.  I bought it at 
Dayton a few years aho, already connectorized. I can believe a 1" minimum bend 
radius with it, but not with the stuff from China.

73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the Reverse Beacon Network
at <http://reversebeacon.net><http://reversebeacon.net>, now
spotting RTTY activity worldwide.
For spots, please use your favorite
"retail" DX cluster.


On 3/13/2019 9:51 AM, N4ZR wrote:

I just bought 10 feet of RG-400U (supposedly Harbour Industries) through E-bay 
for $13.  Belatedly, I learned it was coming from China.  It's now here, but I 
don't think it is for real - it only has one shield, and is somewhat stiff.  At 
least the inner conductor isn't magnetic.There's no printing on the cable.

Buyer beware.


73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the Reverse Beacon Network
at <http://reversebeacon.net><http://reversebeacon.net>, now
spotting RTTY activity worldwide.
For spots, please use your favorite
"retail" DX cluster.


On 3/12/2019 11:35 PM, Wayne Kline wrote:

I third  the sugjestion of the RG400   small enough for  all the switching   in 
a more then one radio setup.

The  tight bend radius the  small diameter make for a clean instlation that 
coupled with the double shielding   it’s a WIN WIN

Watch  Ebay or other surplus suppliers



Wayne W3EA



Sent from 
Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986><https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986>
 for Windows 10



________________________________
From: CQ-Contest 
<cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com><mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com> 
on behalf of charlie carroll <k1xx@k1xx.com><mailto:k1xx@k1xx.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2019 10:23:06 PM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com<mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Re-Build - Coax

Keith:
A couple very similar candidate cables are RG-400 and RG-303. RG-400 is
double shielded while 303 is single.  They're good as interconnects
because they have a small bend radius (about 1"). RG-400 uses
multi-strands of copper for the center conductor; RG-300 uses copper
clad steel.  Either will handle 1500 watts at HF.

73 charlie, k1xx

On 3/12/2019 7:51 PM, Keith Dutson wrote:


My multi-two station, with third spotting station, is being rebuilt into new
digs.  I have a lot of 3-4 foot RG213 cables running between the amp, power
meter, tuner and switch.  I have heard there may be a smaller cable that has
very little loss, but handles 1500 watts.  I would appreciate any comments
on what is being used today.  Thanks.

73, Keith NM5G
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com<mailto:CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest



_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com<mailto:CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com<mailto:CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>