All,
As usual, I think Frank (LPL) gets it right. The opportunity here is not so
much to satisfy our egos with a nice long article that we are smart enough to
find online, but to use the pages to encourage vibrant new activity. (As in
youth and new hams.)
I tried to set this direction in my last results article by opening with a
light piece about excuses not to operate, showing how people easily overcame
such things. The section was cut due to space as I noted, but QST was kind
enough to reprint it solo in Nov 2018 QST as "The Top 10 Reasons Not to Operate
in That Contest." I know, it is only a fluff piece, but I was trying to set a
new voice. I'd still love to do that if the opportunity arises. Not to just
take on a one page results article again, but to actually say something.
Perhaps I waited too long to try.
One criticism is that there are just too many contests competing for pages. I
don't personally agree, but I can see the point. One suggestion might be to
combine CW and SSB results, like a single DX and a single SS article as was the
practice years ago. I think that a reasonable compromise since most editorial
content will apply to both. Certainly better than just having no content; I'd
sign on for that approach.
Thoughts?
73,
Drew K3PA
From: Drew Vonada-Smith
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2019 12:46
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: QST Contest Results
Ed,
I share your sadness on this. I wrote the ARRL DX results for a few years and
generally managed about a 3 to 4 page article for the print version. A more in
depth version that I wrote was placed online with a link provided. The
explanation I always received was that "polling shows that contest results are
one of the least popular items in the magazine". This was NOT from the contest
editor, Ward SIlver, a great guy...just from the CT powers that be.
On the last year I did the article, it was cut at the last minute from the one
page of text I provided along with the tables, down to about half a page. With
the usual link to an online version. This was said to be due to some last
minute advertiser pullout. But that was the last stroke for me - if it was
only worth a page in QST, why was I putting all the effort in? I dropped the
job that year.
As I see it, contests are very popular events, among the highest in radio, and
the current thinking dumbs down the magazine to the lowest common denominator
of guys that don't operate...not the true ham hobbyists. I always get strong
denials on this, but just read the magazine. A new dipole to build? Operating
mobile on your floating inner tube? A highlight piece on some guy with a high
profile job who isn't really on the air? You all get my point. *Yawn*
But, I don't see any of this as likely to change. The focus is on numbers, not
quality.
73,
Drew K3PA
________________________________
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2019 18:57:14 -0400
From: Edward Sawyer
<EdwardS@sbelectronics.com<mailto:EdwardS@sbelectronics.com>>
To: "cq-contest@contesting.com<mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>"
<cq-contest@contesting.com<mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW Contest in QST
Message-ID:
<0D39B6681B67B44DAEC5D6AD99294A8E04CF403F59FA@SBEMAIL.sbelectronics.com<0D39B6681B67B44DAEC5D6AD99294A8E04CF403F59FA@SBEMAIL.sbelectronics.com">mailto:0D39B6681B67B44DAEC5D6AD99294A8E04CF403F59FA@SBEMAIL.sbelectronics.com>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I am not sure if anyone else was struck like I was as to how sad it was that
QST was down to 2 pages for the ARRL DX CW coverage in the August magazine. No
write-up, just some top 10 totals boxes and plaque winners.
I never understood why QST dumps virtually all of its adds in the back. It's
an advertiser's nightmare. Why not allow a couple of advertisers to sponsor a
6 page spread per contest on the 2 ARRL DX contests and get their ads
conspicuously displayed? I am thinking they would be interested.
Ed N1UR
********************
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|