When I first started contesting I fastidiously avoided dupes. But I believe
contest rules were amended to not penalize them, so now I log all dupes.
I guess some haven’t moved on from the dupes =penalty mindset.
Ria
N2RJ
On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 8:51 PM Mike Smith VE9AA <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca> wrote:
> Jeff,
>
>
>
> Like you, I always work dupes. I work very little RTTY, but in the bigger
> CW contests, there always seem to be a very small # of EU's that will work
> me 2, 3 or even 7 times. I can only surmise they trawl up and down the
> bottom end of 20m working the stronger NA stations to 'help them out' in
> the
> contest and are probably are not using a logging program. I had to tell
> one
> guy one time after the 5th or 6th QSO in an hour or so "No more!"
>
>
>
> I loved the "don't think so" you got. I found that very funny (and very sad
> at the same time) (if that makes sense.)
>
>
>
> That'd be a new one on me. Mike VE9AA
>
>
>
> "..I was S&P and called a guy that had apparently worked me - but was not
> in
> my log. I got the "BEFORE" reply which I get a few times each contest and
> for that case, I have a short macro that says "NIL - plz work again". And
> to my complete amazement the guy sent a reply - apparently typed by hand as
> the pace was a bit slower than normal macro exchange speed - "dont think
> so." Wow, never had someone tell me that. So the net result of this is
> he lost a point because he's not in my log and that will pop in the cross
> check. And we must have wasted a minute or two doing the dance. Good move
> all around, OM! .."
>
>
>
> alpha-charlie-zero-charlie
>
> www.ac0c.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Mike, Coreen & Corey
>
> Keswick Ridge, NB
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|