CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Stubs - they are not mysterious

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Stubs - they are not mysterious
From: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: k9yc@arrl.net
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 11:48:06 -0800
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On 1/24/2020 7:28 AM, Jukka Klemola wrote:
K3NA dual stub design is not placement sensitive

WRONG! ANY stub design intended to suppress harmonics IS sensitive to placement if the antenna with which it is used is NOT resonant at the harmonic. The use of double stubs insures that at least one of the stubs will be effective, but the ADDITIONAL effectiveness of the second stub is entirely dependent on its location with respect to the antenna. Putting some numbers to it, double stubs in the "wrong place" with respect to the antenna provide 25-30 dB suppression; in the "right place" they provide an additional 25-30 dB of suppression.

Placement of stubs with respect to the antenna is NOT sensitive ONLY if the antenna is resonant at the harmonic.

and supports both Pi and
PiL output circuit amplifiers.

ANY stub system is sensitive to placement with respect to the power amp.

My analysis of this was peer reviewed at the time of publication in NCJ several years ago. Those who don't have access to it can download it from my website. k9yc.com/publish.htm There is both the text of the NCJ piece and a slide deck for talks I've done about it.

My work included measurements in my lab of stub effectiveness as placement between the power amp and the stub nearest to it was varied, and was done separately with power amps having both an inductor as the output element (Pi-L, a ten Tec Titan 425) and a capacitor output (Elecraft KPA500). The difference between "right" and "wrong" was on the order of 15-18 dB.

On 1/24/2020 8:45 AM, Jim George wrote:
> you can buy professional caliber stubs from W2VJN (Top Ten Devices).

This discussion has NOTHING to do with construction of the stubs, which is as simple as choosing high quality, low loss coax, cutting them to length, tweaking that length with instrumentation as simple as an MFJ-259, and using high quality connectors, properly installed.

A year or so prior to my piece in NCJ, George published a piece in NCJ addressing stub placement, noting that stub systems he'd built were not effective. It got halfway there. My analysis was more thorough, and looked separately at location with respect to both the power amp and the antenna.

73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>