CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] Need for Rules and Enforcement Governing Commercial Entitie

To: "CQ-Contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com>, PVRC Submissions <pvrc@mailman.qth.net>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Need for Rules and Enforcement Governing Commercial Entities Competing in Amateur Radio Contests
From: donovanf@starpower.net
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2020 12:36:01 -0400 (EDT)
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Amateur radio contesting began 100 years ago with the September 1920 
announcement in "Everyday Engineering Magazine" of the rules for 
the February 1921 "Experimental Transatlantic Sending Tests." 


Among other things the rules stated: "Those connected with radio companies 
may enter if they carry on as individuals apart from the organizations in 
which they are employed." The contest included prizes to be awarded 
to successful competitors. 


The leadership of the Transatlantic tests switched to the ARRL as documented 
on page 20 of February 1921 QST: "Everyday Engineering very unfortunately 
has been obliged to suspend publication, and its radio department editor, 
Mr. M. B. Sleeper, has asked the A.R.R.L. to take over the tests and see 
them thru." T hat the February 1921 TransAtlantic Test was a failure has long 
been forgotten because no American signals were heard across the Atlantic. 


Under ARRL's leadership the Second TransAtlantic Test was scheduled for 
December 7-16, 1921. This contest was a big success with many American 
signals copied in Europe -- including signals from powerful amateur station 
1BCG specifically built and operated for the Transatlantic Test by amateurs 
who were also highly skilled and experienced employees of RCA Corporation. 


In very recent years competitors in amateur radio contests have found 
themselves in direct competition with infrastructure built by owners of 
commercial profit making companies in the amateur radio market for 
-- among things -- the purpose of competing in amateur radio contests. 


In some cases the commercial profit making infrastructure was operated by 
the owners of these very same commercial profit making companies to 
win highly competitive single operator DX contests. In the latter case its 
impossible to separate their legitimate interests as amateurs competing in 
amateur radio contests from their commercial profit making motives as 
owners of profit making companies in the amateur radio marketplace. 



This commercial infrastructure owned and in some cases operated by 
owners of theses companies is seriously impacting other competitors in 
DX contests and especially American competitors seeking to qualify for 
WRTC 2022. For example, l ast weekend the owner of a commercial 
profit making company not only used his commercial profit making 
station but he also employed his company's sophisticated information 
technology infrastructure to compete in the ARRL SSB DX Contest. 


Amateur radio contesters and contest sponsors are now at a cross-roads: 
- should amateur competitors continue to compete with increasingly 
sophisticated c ommercial for-profit stations and their directly associated 
commercial profit making sophisticated information technology infrastructure? 
- or should commercial for-profit stations and their dedicated information 
technology infrastructure compete in a new category dedicated to for-profit 
stations and not competing directly with amateur competitors? 


If you're passionate about the future of amateur radio contesting -- as I know 
you are -- this is an excellent time to contact your ARRL Director and 
your CAC member and to energize your contest club in helping sustain 
the competitiveness of amateur contesters in an environment where 
we find increasing participation by commercial for-profit entities. 


73 
Frank 
W3LPL 













_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>