CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Changes for the CQ WW WPX SSB and CW Contests in 2

To: John Crovelli <w2gd@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Changes for the CQ WW WPX SSB and CW Contests in 2021
From: Dave Edmonds <dave@pkministrywebs.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 22:51:12 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I agree totally with John, W2GD! Classic should be 36 hours.  We are more
than able to spin the knob for 36 hours.

73
Dave WN4AFP

On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 6:55 PM John Crovelli <w2gd@hotmail.com> wrote:

> As the result of this rule change announcement, operators who prefer to
> operate without assistance are left with a single choice: 'Classic' .
>
> But even this entry option has been substantially modified with more
> limitations imposed in terms of operating time and competition by power
> levels.
>
> There are no longer both a High Power and Low Power Classic option as
> existed previously ... now just one big 'Classic' group where the HP
> stations will unquestionably prevail over LP entrants.  Does this encourage
> competition for thousands of entrants limited to only 100 watts?   Why HP
> and LP been combined together is something of a mystery since it is so
> unreasonable to expect HP and LP stations to be competitive against one
> another.  I hope the Committee reconsiders this part before the rules are
> published, by restoring both HP and LP categories and perhaps adding a QRP
> category to the Classic group as well.
>
> The other change in Classic rules reduces the allowed operating period
> from 36 to 24 hours.  Do unassisted operators have some inherent need to
> operate fewer hours?  Do they somehow benefit from 1/3 less operating
> time?  Would anyone be enthused about laying out the money to go on a
> DXpedition if they are limited to just half the overall 48-hour operating
> period?
>
> There is still time to do some fine tuning these rule changes.
>
> Regards,
>
> John Crovelli, W2GD
>
> ________________________________
> From: CQ-Contest <cq-contest-bounces+w2gd=hotmail.com@contesting.com> on
> behalf of Jukka Klemola <jpklemola@gmail.com>
> Sent: Monday, November 16, 2020 2:58 PM
> To: RT Clay <rt_clay@bellsouth.net>
> Cc: cq-contest@contesting.com <cq-contest@contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Changes for the CQ WW WPX SSB and CW
> Contests in 2021
>
> As I read the rules, there is a category for the un-assisted.
>
> Behold!
> From CQ WPX Rules:
>
> - - -
> VI. ENTRY CATEGORIES:
>
> A. Single Operator Categories:One person (the operator) performs all
> operating and logging functions.
> ...
> 3. Classic Operator (CLASSIC): The entrant will use only one radio, no QSO
> finding assistance, and the one radio must not be able to receive while
> transmitting. Operator Assisted entries are not eligible for this category.
> - - -
>
>
> The problem, to some, is there is no assistance allowed in this Single
> Operator category.
>
>
> 73,
> Jukka OH6LI
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
-- 
Dave Edmonds
PK Ministry Webs
864.288.6678
dave@pkministrywebs.com
www.pkministrywebs.com
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>