CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW is an unfair Contest -- A solutiion!

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW is an unfair Contest -- A solutiion!
From: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: k9yc@arrl.net
Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2020 13:17:20 -0800
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
This is exactly the kind of rule-making I've been complaining about. Those who make the rules tailor them to benefit themselves, ignoring how they affect others.

73, Jim K9YC

On 12/5/2020 11:51 AM, Richard Smith wrote:
  I agree with Steve, and will add a little more info. When the IARU HF 
Championship began around 1977, with only ITU Zones as multipliers, it was 
possible to win from areas in the world where it was unlikely to win in other 
contests. In fact I was part of the M/S team which placed World High in 1979 
from VE7WJ, and again World High M/S in 1980 from KH6XX. I believe I won for 
the USA in 1984 from AI6V, SOAB.
Then it was decided to change the rules, as Steve noted, to add HQ stations, 
which shifted the optimal areas of the world towards the East Coast and Europe 
for this contest.
73, Rich, N6KT


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>