CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] PSE COPY RYRYRYR

To: "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] PSE COPY RYRYRYR
From: K3TN via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Reply-to: jpescatore@aol.com
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 10:54:52 +0000 (UTC)
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
There are some traditions in RTTY contesting that make sense, since in RTTY not 
as easy for pileups to work as well, harder (well, used to be) to decode more 
than one call at a time.  Like sending the replying station's call before and 
after you send the 599 Exchange back to a number of stations replying, for 
example.
But the use of "DE..." and send the CQer's call in your response doesn't make 
much sense - I think a lot of that comes from the fact that the default RTTY 
.mc files that the N1MM Logger+ software will pull in includes those things.
I  usually don't spend enough time in RTTY contests to have a strong feeling, 
but being iced in most of Saturday I endured more deedle deedling that I 
normally do and you could see most of the verbose exchangers were just using 
the default files. But not all! I never worked the PSE COPY guy, but did work 
many that sent my serial number back, greeted me by name, and/or had automated 
exchanges that were just slightly shortened brag tapes! Not qite to the 
"extension cord used hr is..." but close.
73 John K3TN
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [CQ-Contest] PSE COPY RYRYRYR, K3TN via CQ-Contest <=