CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP CW - Rules Changes Needed

To: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>, reflector cq-contest <CQ-Contest@Contesting.COM>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP CW - Rules Changes Needed
From: Hans Brakob <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2021 15:24:03 +0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Works for me.

So long as the next step is NOT to throw away classic SO.

73, de Hans, KØHB
“Just a Boy and his Radio”™



73, de Hans, KØHB
“Just a Boy and his Radio”™
________________________________
From: CQ-Contest <cq-contest-bounces+kzerohb=gmail.com@contesting.com> on 
behalf of Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 8, 2021 7:21:05 AM
To: reflector cq-contest <CQ-Contest@Contesting.COM>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] NAQP CW - Rules Changes Needed

Now that this running is behind us, the organizers need to seriously
consider a change in the rules.

It is unnecessary, and downright punitive, to push assisted single ops
into Multi-2, instead of creating a separate single op assisted
category. Many of us, with limited antennas (see HOAs) can only S&P.
Without assistance, operating becomes a deadly boring sequence of tune,
copy, type the call in, be told it's a dupe, and repeat.

The rule now consigns assisted ops to submergence in the multi-op
category, when it would be so simple to create a single-op assisted
category. It's certainly not in the interest of expanding NAQP
participation to continue punishing assisted ops this way.  Time to act!

--
73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the new Reverse Beacon Network
web server at <http://beta.reversebeacon.net>.
For spots, please use your favorite
"retail" DX cluster.

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>