CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Past Prediction of the Future of Contesting.

To: <rjairam@gmail.com>, "'Jeff Clarke'" <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Past Prediction of the Future of Contesting.
From: "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 14:09:08 +0200
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Not anti-technology but anti-internet use in contests I guess.
Otherwise no radio is necessary, use Hemsphere.

73
Peter


-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces+dj7ww=t-online.de@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
rjairam@gmail.com
Sent: Montag, 23. August 2021 04:02
To: Jeff Clarke
Cc: CQ-Contest Reflector
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Past Prediction of the Future of Contesting.

Re-read what I said. You read the first part then went off on a rant
based on that alone.

I did say you should have a choice. But "Please, no, a thousand times
NO!" by Hans means that he doesn't want that piece of tech to exist.
THAT is being anti-technology.

Ria
N2RJ

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>