CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] "Drafted" into SS

To: "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] "Drafted" into SS
From: Ron Notarius W3WN via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 12:30:38 +0000 (UTC)
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Maybe they needed V3 in their logs for 80 (or overall), and in their 
exuberance, forgot you weren't an eligible for the contest?
Maybe they were new to SS, especially if they are recent licensees or recent 
upgrades to HF?
Regardless, their problem, not yours.
WFWL
73


-----Original Message-----
From: Bill kollenbaum via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
To: cq-contest@contesting.com <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Mon, Nov 8, 2021 7:20 am
Subject: [CQ-Contest] "Drafted" into SS

Put up a new inverted  V for 80 today and was trying it out on the low end of 
80.  In the course of two hours I had quite a few callers, but 5 of them were 
notable.
After giving them their 579, 589, 599, they proceeded to give  me a SS exchange 
despite the fact I am a V31.  Do we have that many ops that don't know the 
rules?  I was quite surprised to have not one, but five of these guys call in.
Bill V31XX/K4XS
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>