CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] "Back in the day" -- Single- or Multi-op?

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] "Back in the day" -- Single- or Multi-op?
From: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 14:46:14 -0400
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Tools are tools, Jim - thank goodness that progress continues.

73, Pete N4ZR

On 10/12/2023 1:42 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
On 10/12/2023 6:58 AM, Zack Widup wrote:
  Rules can be changed.

Yes. Contesting has changed drastically over the years. When many of us started, we logged on paper and kept paper dupe sheets. There were no memory keyers. And then there was one that kept track of serial numbers! Contest rules have gotten dumber. All of the attention paid to "records" is nonsense.

Use of Check Partial is, in reality, assistance. So are Call History files. N1MM depends on CH files to determine whether a spot is a multiplier.

Some state QSO parties consider a person who drives while another operates a second operator.

73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>