CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Acking Sprint QSO's

To: john@kk9a.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Acking Sprint QSO's
From: Barry Jacobson <bdj@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 15:39:49 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
He is saying that if the CQer copied the info correctly, and then went
away, it is the second guy's problem if he doesn't get all the info in
current scoring system.

--
Barry Jacobson
WA2VIU
bdj@alum.mit.edu
@bdj_phd

On Tue, Feb 6, 2024, 3:36 PM <john@kk9a.com> wrote:

> How can you even log the QSO if you did not copy all of the information?
>
> John KK9A
>
>
> NM5M wrote:
>
> A solution to the ack issue is to make a QSO count (via log checking) only
> if the info is correct on both sides.
>
> Those super competitive would be incentivized to be sure their info was
> received correctly.
>
> Eric NM5M
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>