To: | <ct-user@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | CT and IC-736 or IC-738? |
From: | fisher@hp-and.an.hp.com (Tony Brock-Fisher) |
Date: | Wed, 1 Mar 1995 13:43:22 -0500 |
If you have to choose - use the 765 address, not the 735 address. The 765 and 781 will do split from CT - the 735 won't. -Tony, K1KP, fisher@hp-and.an.hp.com -- Submissions: ct-user@eng.pko.dec.com Administrative requests: ct-user-request@eng.pko.dec.com Problems: reisert@eng.pko.dec.com |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | CT and IC-736 or IC-738?, ken silverman |
---|---|
Next by Date: | New CT Version?, Phill Duff |
Previous by Thread: | CT and IC-736 or IC-738?, ken silverman |
Next by Thread: | ct and ic-736 or ic-738?, ken.silverman@bbs.logicnet.com |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |