CT-User
[Top] [All Lists]

[K1to: Re: Bug in .BRK file]

To: <ct-user@contesting.com>
Subject: [K1to: Re: Bug in .BRK file]
From: Waltk@PICA.ARMY.MIL (Waltk@PICA.ARMY.MIL)
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 95 22:01:15 EST
----- Forwarded message # 1:

Received: from cor3.pica.army.mil by COR5.PICA.ARMY.MIL id aa01271;
          15 Mar 95 21:55 EST
Received: from mail06.mail.aol.com by COR3.PICA.ARMY.MIL id aa17579;
          15 Mar 95 21:55 EST
Received: by mail06.mail.aol.com
        (1.37.109.11/16.2) id AA230312523; Wed, 15 Mar 1995 21:55:23 -0500
To: <ct-user@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 1995 21:55:23 -0500
From: K1to@aol.com
Message-Id: <950315215500_50868402@aol.com>
To: Waltk@PICA.ARMY.MIL
Subject: Re: Bug in .BRK file

Did you log the first QSO before 0000Z?  If it still works the same way it
did in prior versions, CT will tick off 60-minute segments beginning at your
first QSO.  

This was annoying when I'd operate part-time and not start until 1200Z, for
example.  The .BRK file would show my first hour in the 00Z hour and go from
there...

Perhaps it's been fixed!

73, Dan

----- End of forwarded messages

--
Submissions:              ct-user@eng.pko.dec.com
Administrative requests:  ct-user-request@eng.pko.dec.com
Problems:                 reisert@eng.pko.dec.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [K1to: Re: Bug in .BRK file], Waltk@PICA.ARMY.MIL <=