On Tue, 9 Mar 1999, Michael S. Mitchell, W6RW wrote:
> Hi Jim...we used CT version 9.27 for the ARRL CW contest as a
> multi-two entry.
I was told that you needed to use a version above 9.34 for proper
FT1000MP control. I used 9.23 for years, it was very stable. The
addition of the MP precipitated the upgrade.
> The "W6RW.LOG" file produced by CT is in perfect
> compliance with the ARRL requirements....including the state sent,
> a zero or a one for which transmitter made the qso.
Using 9.37A the state sent is NOT in the .log file. And now that I
understand the significance of the "0" and "1" in the right-hand column,
that does work. I had tried bothe WRITELOG and WRITEARRL with the same
results in the .log file.
So it appears that I am semi-compliant as long as Newington accepts the
following item on the summary sheet:
"All transmitted state reports were California and a "0" in the righthand
column indicated the QSO was made on station one and a "1" in the
righthand column indicated station two."
I say semi-compliant since the log format says all the station 1/station
2 info and the transmitted data must appear in the .log file. To me that
implies not needing to look at the .sum file or needing a decoder ring!
Getting closer!
73, Jim N6IG
--
Submissions: ct-user@contesting.com
Administrative requests: ct-user-REQUEST@contesting.com
WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ct/
Questions: owner-ct-user@contesting.com
|