To: | <ct-user@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [ct-user] CT 9.43 and Ethenet Nettsr |
From: | NB1B@aol.com (NB1B@aol.com) |
Date: | Sun, 17 Oct 1999 07:19:55 EDT |
My experience echoes that of Wil DJ7AA. I tried CT 9.43 on a working Ethernet network at W1KM yesterday. 9.43 wouldn't work- switched back to 9.39 and it worked without a problem. OTOH, we have a lot of 1000MPs that worked just fine on CT 9.39. We're not doing SS as a multi-op, so it looks like 9.39 will make it through CQWW. Dennis NB1B -- Submissions: ct-user@contesting.com Administrative requests: ct-user-REQUEST@contesting.com WWW: http://www.k1ea.com/ Questions: owner-ct-user@contesting.com |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [ct-user] CT <-> Icom crashes, K0HB - Hans |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [ct-user] RE: New Master Callsign Databases available for CT/NA/TR/WL, Jim Reisert AD1C |
Previous by Thread: | [ct-user] Network Armada 1530d, Jan Almedal |
Next by Thread: | [ct-user] CT 9.43 and Ethenet Nettsr, <glaparol@mbox.infcom.it (G.La Parola, IT9BLB) |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |