| To: | ct-user@contesting.com | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [ct-user] Is CT development dead? | 
| From: | Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us> | 
| Date: | Mon, 17 May 2010 17:58:21 -0500 | 
| List-post: | <ct-user@contesting.com">mailto:ct-user@contesting.com> | 
| Thanks for your time and information, Ken, and thanks for putting CT out there for us in the first place. It will be missed. 73, de Nate >> -- "The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears this is true." Ham radio, Linux, bikes, and more: http://n0nb.us/index.html _______________________________________________ CT-User mailing list CT-User@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/ct-user CT on the web: http://www.k1ea.com/ | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
| 
 
 | ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [ct-user] Is CT development dead?, Ken Wolff | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [ct-user] Is CT development dead?, Ken Wolff | 
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [ct-user] Is CT development dead?, Ken Wolff | 
| Next by Thread: | Re: [ct-user] Is CT development dead?, Ken Wolff | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |