NA-User
[Top] [All Lists]

[na-user] Re: Missing Key Strokes

To: <na-user@contesting.com>
Subject: [na-user] Re: Missing Key Strokes
From: tgstewart@pepco.com (tgstewart@pepco.com)
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 1997 08:06:42 -0400
I'm running in regular Windows 95 DOS windows (not dedicated) with super
check partial running.  It does the same thing on both computers although
it might not be quite as bad on the faster one:  a 486DX66 and a P150+.

One thing I did find a while back is that running DVP boards, the only way
I could get them to work was to run in a SHARED DOS window (not dedicated).
Although I still get a little popping every once in a while, at least it
doesnt crash!

I did have one very brief period during NAQP CW where the NA keyer was
sounding pretty spastic (using LPT1), but it cleared up fairly quickly.

73, Ty K3MM





k8cc@ix.netcom.com on 08/17/97 08:54:51 PM

Please respond to k8cc@ix.netcom.com

To:   na-user@contesting.com
cc:    (bcc: Tyler G Stewart/BENN/CEC)
Subject:  [na-user] Re: Missing Key Strokes




Recently, several people (W4AN, WB5M, N4BP & K3MM) have reported
missing keystrokes when using NA.  I have not seen this problem, but
I've also not been terribly active this summer, which is understandable.
Nothing has changed in this area of the code since last winter when we
made some changes responding to similar complaints.  Nobody reported
any problems in ARRL DX, so I thought things were fixed.
The keyboard routine grew to be rather complicated as a result of the
automatic check partial stuff.  When doing doing a auto check partial
(filling up the window), if another key is pressed it is necessary to stop
and start over.  This code was constructed very carefully to make this
work,
however I wonder if there is somehow a problem in this area.
This week I plan to look over the entire keyboard input process to see if
it
cannot be streamlined and eliminate this problem.
One thing I want to know is if this problem occurs when running NA under
Win95.  This COULD be the source of the problem.  I know from first hand
experience at WRTC-96 that the DOS window in Win95 creates problems
that are not NA's fault.  For example, the CW sending would sound OK on
the computer sidetone, but would not key an LPT port, but would key on a
COM port.  Paddles connected to the same LPT would work fine.  I can't be
responsible for this.  In so many words, NA IS A DOS PROGRAM.  Use
under windows at your own risk.
To WB5M, here are the requirements for two radios to work:
1) "Two radios" must be selected in the EQUIPMENT CONTROL PANEL.
2) A port must be selected for the two-radio interface.
3) For computer controlled radios to work, both must have types selected
   in CONFIG's Equipement Setup, ports selected in the COM Port Setup,
   and must be turned on in the EQUIPMENT CONTROL PANEL.
When two radios are working, there is a "TX#1" or "TX#2" icon on the NA
Command Bar above the logging window.
73,

Dave Pruett, K8CC                         DATOM Engineering
2727 Harris Rd, Ypsilanti, MI 48198       DATOM@contesting.com
k8cc@ix.netcom.com                        http://www.contesting.com/datom
--
Submissions:              na-user@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  na-user-REQUEST@contesting.com
WWW:                      http://www.contesting.com/datom/
Questions:                owner-na-user@contesting.com








--
Submissions:              na-user@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  na-user-REQUEST@contesting.com
WWW:                      http://www.contesting.com/datom/
Questions:                owner-na-user@contesting.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>