I also noticed the slow band change when I did my recent check
I put it down to my ageing computer, but maybe not now.
----- Original Message -----
From: David A. Pruett <email@example.com>
To: DAN KOVATCH <firstname.lastname@example.org>; <email@example.com>
Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 11:46 PM
Subject: Re: [NA-User] FWIW NA1057
> What type of radio was this with?
> I noticed on Field Day that the CQ repeat delays were much longer than
> should be. This might be related, as all the timing for the non-critical
> functions comes off of a master timer in the main loop.
> I did some investigation of this during Field Day (I was the VHF guy so
> QSOs were hardly coming at a blazing rate) but did not get to the bottom
> it. I don't know what has caused this - I did not consciously make any
> changes that would affect the timing.
> Its my goal to get the bottom of this before IARU this coming weekend
> (along with the FT100 mode bug and some of the other bugs that have been
> At 04:49 PM 7/5/02 -0400, DAN KOVATCH wrote:
> >After the recent posts about NA1057 and keying/band changing I thought
> >better check it out. The rig keys fine in cw and switches bands okay. I
> >used the same setup on the config file as 56 in 57.
> >BUT, I noticed that the band change seems to take about 5 seconds whereas
> >in NA1056 it takes only second or so. For my 'blazing' operating style
> >this may not be a problem but some of our faster bandchangers may want to
> >check this out.
> >Dan Kovatch
> >en81 Erie County OH
> >NA-User mailing list
> NA-User mailing list