RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

[RFI] QST Article Ignores RFI

To: <rfi@contesting.com>
Subject: [RFI] QST Article Ignores RFI
From: w1rfi@arrl.org (Hare,Ed, W1RFI)
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 10:21:05 -0500
Hi, Pete,

In fairness, though, ARRL has featured a LOT of articles on RFI over the
years, so it does pay a lot of attention to the subject.  Last year, they
even added a full-time RFI staff, John Phillips, K2QAI.

http://www.arrl.org/members-only/qqnsearch.html and type in the word RFI.
:-)

No comment on the editorial aspects of the article...

73, 
Ed Hare, W1RFI
ARRL Lab
225 Main St
Newington, CT 06111
Tel: 860-594-0318
Internet: w1rfi@arrl.org
Web: http://www.arrl.org/tis



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pete Smith [mailto:n4zr@contesting.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 2:18 AM
> To: rfi@contesting.com
> Subject: [RFI] QST Article Ignores RFI
> 
> 
> After a postal screwup, I just received my January QST.  It includes a
> 9-9age (!) article by NT0Z on building PCs.  
> 
> Whatever one thinks of the editorial wisdom of devoting so 
> much space to
> this topic, I was astonished that the article contains no 
> mention of inward
> or outward RFI, which has been a major preoccupation on this 
> reflector over
> the years.  Selection of cases, power supplies and certainly 
> monitors for
> the hamshack should certainly take RFI into account, but 
> there's not a word
> on the subject there. 
> 
> 73, Pete N4ZR
> 
> Sometimes a tower is
> just a tower
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> RFI mailing list
> RFI@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
> 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>