RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

[RFI] Fwd: [TowerTalk] Potentially interesting FCC ruling today

To: <rfi@contesting.com>
Subject: [RFI] Fwd: [TowerTalk] Potentially interesting FCC ruling today
From: n4zr at contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Mon Jul 7 21:05:41 2003
FYI

>Return-Path: <towertalk-bounces@contesting.com>
>From: Scott Townley <nx7u@cox.net>
>Organization: NX7U
>To: towertalk@contesting.com
To: <rfi@contesting.com>
>Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 17:19:52 -0400
>Subject: [TowerTalk] Potentially interesting FCC ruling today
>Reply-To: nx7u@arrl.net
>
>DA 03-2196
>WT- Docket No. 02-100
>Adopted July 3, 2003 and released July 7, 2003
>MO&O stating essentially that municipal ordinances which directly regulate 
>RFI are invalid, as the FCC is the sole jurisdiction regarding RFI.
>Case was a cellular carrier vs. a county in MD.  County ordinance was 
>directed at commercial carriers, but precedent is important!
>
>
>Scott Townley NX7U
>Gilbert, AZ  DM43di
>
>_______________________________________________
>
>See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless 
>Weather Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with 
>any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
>
>_______________________________________________
>TowerTalk mailing list
>TowerTalk@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

73, Pete N4ZR
The World HF Contest Station Database was updated 17 June 03.
Are you current? www.pvrc.org/wcsd/wcsdsearch.htm



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [RFI] Fwd: [TowerTalk] Potentially interesting FCC ruling today, Pete Smith <=