[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFI] PLCA Response to WSJ Article

To: rfi@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RFI] PLCA Response to WSJ Article
From: "N6KJ" <kelly@thejohnsons.ws>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 12:31:42 -0700 (PDT)
List-post: <mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
So, I guess all that work going on in Raleigh to eliminate BPL interference
is just being done to keep a few technicians employed?  If BPL didn't
cause interference, then the BPL providers in Raleigh wouldn't be running
around like chickens with their heads cut off trying to notch the
ham bands and modify their equipment so that it doesn't use the ham bands.

What IS this guy smoking?  

I wonder if his e-mail works.  He's gonna get one from me in a few minutes!

On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 13:53:47 -0400, Eric Rosenberg wrote:

> This is the Power Line Communications Association's response to the Wall
> Street Journal article on BPL.  
> It comes from the PLCA website: 
> http://www.plca.net/newsandevents.wsjresponse.htm       
> [ Stuff Deleted ]
RFI mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>