To: | rfi@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [RFI] Recent BPL Comments |
From: | Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com> |
Date: | Sun, 27 Jun 2004 21:17:45 -0400 |
List-post: | <mailto:rfi@contesting.com> |
Reading recent public statements on BPL from the President, UPLC and ARRL,
unlike some other people I am immensely encouraged. Three months ago
interference to and from BPL wasn't even mentioned at the top level of our
government; today the President declares the intention to make sure BPL and
other services can coexist, in the rules to be adopted. UPLC panics and
begins throwing bricks; this strikes me as the response of someone who
knows they are losing. Meanwhile ARRL reports the collapse of the
Manassas, VA experiment. The fact is that BPL can be made benign vis-a-vis licensed services, but only by fencing off so much of the spectrum (and otherwise protecting licensed services) that it will not be able to deliver on its promise of high-speed internet service at a cost competitive with other delivery systems. With WiMax perhaps only a year away, why would any rational company management invest in BPL now? I think what we are witnessing is a broad-band exercise in face-saving. It may be premature to rejoice, but I think they're on the run. 73, Pete N4ZR The World HF Contest Station Database was updated on June 5, 2004 2728 contest stations at www.pvrc.org/WCSD/WCSDsearch.htm _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [RFI] Benefits to power companies, Jim Miller |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [RFI] Electrostatic filter rfi, W5FKX - Don |
Previous by Thread: | [RFI] writing to UPLC, Jim Jarvis |
Next by Thread: | Re: [RFI] Recent BPL Comments, k2qmf |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |