I have my doubts that you will find published electrical data on the
expanding foam products. I agree with Tom's suggestions (below) about
doing no more than wasting one set of traps, but there might be an even
less expensive approach: if I understand your trap construction
correctly, the foam will be in contact with the wire and the ceramic caps
that are to be enclosed within each trap structure. Therefore, the most
important electrical characteristics would seem to be dielectric constant
and loss tangent. (Yes, corrosion that can result when using products
containing acetic acid is a problem, but it is not, strictly speaking, an
electrical problem.)
If you have a way to read capacitance, or can borrow a capacitance meter,
take one of the ceramic caps that will be used in the traps and measure
its actual value with the meter. Now, encapsulate that ceramic cap with
the foam you propose to use and let it set up and dry. Clean off the cap
leads so that you can make contact with them and measure the capacitance
value again. By how much did it increase? (I'll assume that the effect
of the foam dielectric constant, whatever it is, will be to increase the
effective value of the ceramic capacitors because the foam replaces the
air that would normally exist between the cap's leads if it were not
encapsulated.) You'll need to consider that new value when designing the
coils for the trap.
Next, apply some of the proposed foam to a microwave oven safe plate or
container. You don't need a lot - a glob of about an inch or so in
diameter should be enough. After it sets up and dries, stick the foamed
plate or container into a microwave and "shoot the juice" to it. Keep a
very watchful eye, especially if you see smoke or color change within
seconds of applying RF to the sample. The idea here is to get an idea of
the loss factor (tangent) of the particular foam in which you are
interested. If it gets real hot, you don't want to use it. (That's one
reason that PVC is not used for the dielectric in coax cables. It's loss
factor is higher than for polyethylene.)
Assuming that you now have found at least one foam product that doesn't
have too much RF loss and it did not shift capacitance value by more than
5% or so, you are ready to make your traps. One more caveat, however: if
the foam is going to fill the spaces between coil turns, that emans you
will be placing a dielectric material between the coils, effectively
increasing the capacitance between turns. This can also result in
detuning after you have totally assembled the traps. Given that thought,
it may be better to just leave the trap capsules unfilled (air only) with
a moisture drain hole on the bottom and some sort of weather tight seal at
the top end.
Good luck with the project. Please let us know what you decide and how it
all works out. Thanks.
- Dale
WA9ENA
Tom Cox <tomcox@iquest.net>
Sent by: rfi-bounces@contesting.com
10/30/2007 12:22 PM
To
rfi@contesting.com
cc
Subject
Re: [RFI] RFI Digest, Vol 58, Issue 27
Don't know about RF characteristics, but some of those products have a
strong acetic acid smell as they cure. They might be corrosive to
copper. You can buy silicone caulk that is (supposedly) low in acetic
acid. I don't know if foam is available similarly. You might try a test
batch in a PVC capsule with some copper wire, and see how it looks after
a week or so. If it eats the wire, RF characteristics are moot.
As to RF characteristics -- If you find foam that doesn't corrode the
copper, and you can afford a realistic test, build a trap in PVC, run it
on an analyzer (MFJ259B or similar), and run it again after filling it
with foam and allowing it to cure. Wasting one set of trap components is
better than wasting a bunch. If you share your results with the list,
many will probably appreciate it. Good luck.
73,
Tom, KT9OM
rfi-request@contesting.com wrote:
> Send RFI mailing list submissions to
> rfi@contesting.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> rfi-request@contesting.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> rfi-owner@contesting.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of RFI digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Foam (Rick D)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 18:21:28 -0700
> From: Rick D <n6pe@pacbell.net>
> Subject: [RFI] Foam
> To: Topband <topband@contesting.com>, SCCC <sccc@contesting.com>, RTTY
> <rtty@contesting.com>, RFI <RFI@CONTESTING.COM>
> Message-ID: <47268718.5020401@pacbell.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Anyone know the electrical/RF characteristics of the various expanding
> foam products?
>
> I am building some traps for my 160/80/40 L and was considering filling
> them with foam. Traps are made from old RO water filters with #12 wire
> and HV ceramic caps mounted inside.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|