Whatever happened to digital AM-BC?
Would that not overcome the problem?
I am guessing the cost and the competition with
converting TV derailed that but perhaps now is
the time.
I don't know if a digital AM-BC converter is a
practical option as a majority of listeners likely
use automobile receivers or portable receivers vs
most TV's being fixed-location.
This would mean another multi-year phase-out to
give people time to replace their AM receivers.
As you say, our suppressed-economy makes such a
program financially improbable.
> My AM consultant buddy told me 5 years ago that the
> measurable noise increase in metro areas had risen 13 dB
> over the last 10 years. The reason I asked was our
> stations EBS AM antenna reception had degraded to the
> point that it would no longer trip the decoders. (Bad in
> the FCC's opinion) So down came the hb EWE and up went a
> commercial loop. Problem solved for the next 10 years.
>
> This is like the miners canary in the cage for over the
> air reception.
>
> Problem for the AM broadcasters is they couldn't afford
> to run enough power to overcome the increase in the
> baseband noise. Given the steep competition and loss of
> revenue it only makes matters worse, 6 dB is not going to
> help.
>
> 73 Scott N0AR
>
--
.Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E
.Have an http://ultrafidian.com day!
.
. |_|___|_|
. | | & | |
. {|
. /\ {|
. / \ {|
. / @ \ {|
. | |~_|~~~~|
. | -| | |
.=================== http://kd4e.com
.Free OS : http://www.PuppyLinux.com
.Google Street View logs WiFi networks & Mac addresses
.Use http://Startpage.com instead - they respect privacy
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|