How do you know your wide-spaced OWL isn't picking up noise that is then
radiated by your 135-ft doublet and re-picked up by your 40-m inverted V to be
sent down your 52-ohm coax to your receiver? In that case, your choke balun on
the 40-m coax cable has nothing to do with anything.
Bud, W2RU
On Oct 19, 2010, at 4:27 PM, dalej wrote:
> I have 135 ft doublet fed with 100 ft of wide spaced open wire line to a
> Johnson KW match box. I also have a 40 m. inverted V fed with 70 ft of 52
> ohm coax and choke balun, both are suspended at the same point on my tower
> and oriented in the same direction. I hear my neighbors light dimmer equally
> well with both antennas tuned to 40 meters. I am not convinced that in my
> case, coax would work better than open wire feeders regarding the noise
> problem.
>
> 73
> Dale, K9VUJ
>
>
> On 19, Oct 2010, at 12:31, Jim Brown wrote:
>
>> On 10/19/2010 8:35 AM, Howard Lester wrote:
>>> Gene right
>>> off asked me if I was feeding my antenna with ladder line. I replied "Yes,
>>> and it runs through the wall and connects directly to the transmatch on my
>>> desk." He said that was the problem.
>>
>> Yes. Folks have bought into the notion that ladder line is a cure for
>> all ills, that you can put up any wire and feed it with no problems.
>> Nothing could be further from the truth. The monster hole in this
>> approach is NOISE and RFI. The developers of telephone communications
>> learned more than a century ago that twisted pair was at rejecting noise
>> and crosstalk, and that parallel wires were bad.
>>
>> Why this is true is pretty simple. Voltage is induced in both wires, and
>> if it is equal, the receiver will see zero voltage. But if the voltages
>> are slightly different, the receiver will see the difference. If the
>> noise source is relatively close, it will be closer to one conductor
>> than the other, so the voltage will be slightly different. With twisted
>> pair, one conductor will be closer at one point on the line and the
>> other will be closer a fractional inch down the line, so the induced
>> noise is much closer to zero, and the cancellation is more nearly perfect.
>>
>> This discussion applies to differential coupling. There's also common
>> mode coupling, of course, and antennas fed with ladder line rarely have
>> a common mode choke. But they NEED a common mode choke, because nearly
>> all ham antennas have at least SOME unbalance by virtue of asymmetry in
>> their surroundings, their length, etc. Yes, coax has more loss and it
>> costs more, but we can choke it, and there's no differential coupling at
>> proper connections. And all of this works in reverse, of course, by
>> reciprocity, so ladder line puts more RF in your neighbor's A/V system
>> and computer speakers too.
>>
>> 100 years later, we use parallel wires for speakers and power wiring. El
>> dumbo grande. Replacing them with twisted pair solves a LOT of noise and
>> RFI problems. And ladder line is a TERRIBLE idea if you have neighbors.
>> Or any noise generators in your home.
>>
>> 73, Jim Brown K9YC
>> _______________________________________________
>> RFI mailing list
>> RFI@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>
> _______________________________________________
> RFI mailing list
> RFI@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|