Your vertical whip coupled into the bottom fed loop works great for
vertically polarized signals but does not work for horizontally
polarized signals IMHO. Sorry if you think I was attacking you. I
have built many loops with a vertical sense antenna and after adjusting
the magnitude and phase to work well with vertically polarized signals I
could never get a "reasonable" unidirectional lobe for horizontal
signals. If you disagree with me, please post some reference or design
that I could build.
I have done probably a thousand transmitter hunts mostly on 80m and 2m
with a few on 10m and 70cm. I have competed in competitive ARDF hunts
on 80m and 2m and I have also done many searches for RFI. I have tried
coupling RF into power lines by coupling into the AC wiring in a house.
In every case (with overhead power lines) I was easily able to find the
source without the outside power lines becoming a radiator that masked
the house where the source was actually located. I attributed this to
the massive capacitance in the transformer feeding the house and the
fact that the transformer case is always grounded. Have you seen
something different?
73,
Larry, W0QE
On 4/2/2014 6:07 PM, Roger Parsons wrote:
A couple of points:
The sense circuit does not need a goniometer in its simple form. All you need
is a whip antenna physically pretty much in the same place as the loop. A
vertical whip is omnidirectional. That needs to be coupled into the loop - a
single turn similar to the coupling to the receiver works well. The phase
relationship is then correct, although you need to determine by experiment
which direction is maximum and which minimum.(The sense direction is at right
angles to the loop null directions.) The fly in the ointment is that the
signals from the loop (broadside) and the whip should ideally have identical
amplitudes. They will not, so you will need an amplifier (a few dB) in the feed
from the whip.
I was bemused by the attack on me by Larry, W0QE, who cannot conceivably know
how much experience I have in direction finding. I don't think it's remotely
relevant, and I don't like blowing my own trumpet, but I don't like being
attacked so I feel I have to tell you - or actually W0QE.
I was originally licensed in 1962 in England and for most of the next 20 years
I took part in about 10 DF contests (mostly 160m but some 80m) every year with
gaps of several years when I was overseas. Each of those contests had 2 or 3
hidden stations which could each be up to 25 miles from the start. The stations
were very, very well hidden, used fiendish antennas, short random
transmissions, and some of the contests were at night. I won quite a lot of
those competitions and was national champion twice.
I have DFd various nasty noises and spurii on many occasions in many locations
in several countries. As my primary interest in amateur radio is 160m DX I have
usually started on that band in trying to find the problem, but have switched
to VHF as soon as practical as I got closer. I must admit that I have failed to
find the nasty on a few occasions - most particularly when it was not strong
enough to be heard on my DF receiver, but was still a nuisance on the main
antennas.
I have also been professionally involved in underground (coal and hard rock
mine) communications for much of my career. Amongst other things, I learnt
quite a lot about coupling and extraneous conductors.
So I do have a teeny weeny bit of experience.
W0QE said that my "Comments made about noise in a home getting on the power lines
are speculation by folks who have probably never actually done much DFing".
Actually, they are not speculation. You may have noticed, Larry, that when two conductors
are placed in parallel, a single wire mode signal on one conductor is transfered to the
other one. Theory and practice says this must be so. You may have also noticed that most
services in North America are carried on parallel overhead conductors - typically power,
telephone, cable TV and an elevated 'ground' cable. There is a continual transfer of
signals between each of those conductors so the fact that there may be a transformer in
one of the legs is irrelevant.
In my experience it is best to triangulate bearings on a map rather than try to
go straight towards the target. Others may find the latter technique works best
for them.
73 Roger
VE3ZI
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|