Thanks, Kim. I was following your thread, but somehow missed the fact that it
was UVerse you were talking about! It was your thread that got me wondering
if/when I should change. I am not looking for the TV programming either (nor
the phone service really).
I am not experiencing any problems with the current AT&T equipment. I believe
you had problems with the DC before the swap. So maybe a changeover will not be
as painful as I thought.
- Larry K5RK
From: Kim Elmore [mailto:cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 6:47 AM
To: Larry Burke
Cc: <rfi@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RFI] UVerse - Any Recent Experience?
I just went to what AT&T calls Uverse but without the TV programming. I wound
the DC line a dozen or so turns around a 2.4" type 43 ferrite toroid and have
no RFI egress or ingress at 1.5 kW 160-10 m. I would have problems without the
choke.
Kim N5OP
"People that make music together cannot be enemies, at least as long as the
music lasts." -- Paul Hindemith
On Mar 23, 2015, at 16:50, "Larry Burke" <wi5a@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
When UVerse was first rolled out there were all sorts of RFI problems. The
modems generated RFI and were impacted by RF from nearby transmitters. Does
anyone have any recent experience with UVerse? Have things gotten better? I
am currently on AT&T DSL and would consider switching to UVerse if the RFI
problems have been solved. I'd only need it to replace my current DSL, not
for the phone or TV. AT&T is really the only internet option here in the
sticks.
Larry K5RK
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|