Until the FCC's leadership and mission are clarified; do they
serve partisan values, private for-profit interests, or are
they truly public servants who enforce the law equally & are
vastly more transparent - they don't need any more of my tax
dollars.
Meanwhile, the least government involvement in most things
has usually proved best, so every effort to ID & resolve RFI
locally makes sense.
Perhaps more social networking may be effective in "shaming"
corporations (including big importers like Amazon and import
clearinghouses like ebay) into demanding quality products -
free of RFI may work.
Posting company and product names on a well-publicized blog
may get things rolling.
It may be that publicizing RF-pollution of wireless device
frequencies may draw more into the battle as the internet-
of-everything is very popular right now.
Consider how social pressure has caused other changes -
even without boycotts - merely "bad press" can motivate.
IMHO, YMMV ... David KD4E
> On Fri,7/31/2015 12:52 PM, Hare, Ed W1RFI wrote:
>> I'd suggest that hams send an email to their directors, letting them
>> know how they feel about the resolution.
>
> More important, write to your congressman demanding that they 1) pass
> legislation requiring the FCC to enforce their own Rules and 2)
> appropriate the funds so that FCC has both staff and other resources to
> do so. #2 is the heart of the problem -- the FCC was gutted at least 30
> years ago, and Congress did it.
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
--
*David* KD4E
ARES-EC Bulloch County, Nevils, Georgia USA
Safe & Secure Search Engine: duckduckgo.com
Android for Hams: groups.yahoo.com/group/hamdroid
Creative Tech: groups.yahoo.com/group/ham-macguyver
Raspi Alternative: groups.yahoo.com/group/beagleboneblack/
Restored to design-spec at Heaven's gate 1Cor15:22
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|