I've had uVerse, TV/phone/internet, for several years. RF on 20 meters had been
quite bad at freezing things up. A month or two back, due to some on demand
video issues, AT&T replaced the old equipment with an Arris NVG589 modem. This
us an all in one box, no more outside/inside multiple units.
With some ferrite on the cables to this box (added on general principle) it has
seemed to be better than the previous.equipment. Only downside is that if you
get a power hit, it takes about two minutes for everything, telephone included,
to reboot. I have on my things to do list to add a battery backup to get around
this issue.
73 - Jim K8MR
-----Original Message-----
From: Gary Smith via RFI <rfi@contesting.com>
To: rfi <rfi@contesting.com>
Sent: Sun, Aug 30, 2015 12:47 pm
Subject: Re: [RFI] U-Verse
I have dealt with AT&T re DSL and U-Verse only to receive a different
level of
unsatisfaction.
Against my own better wishes, I went with Comcast. To this
date, as of 3
years ago, it has been bulletproof and fast, not a (service)
blip since
day one.
Gary...wa6fgi
On 8/28/2015 2:13 PM, Larry Burke
wrote:
> I'm thinking of upgrading my DSL to U-Verse (internet only, no TV or
phone).
> Can anyone offer any thoughts on AT&T's current hardware with regards
to RFI
> produced and susceptibility to RF from a legal-limit amateur station?
I'm
> particularly interested in experience on 160m and 6m. My current DSL
>
hardware is relatively free of RFI problems.
>
>
>
> For those with
experience, I'd be interested in which residential gateway
> you have.
>
>
>
> Larry K5RK
>
> _______________________________________________
> RFI
mailing list
> RFI@contesting.com
>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
_______________________________________________
RFI
mailing
list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|