To: | "rfi@contesting.com" <rfi@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [RFI] SETI |
From: | nm8rmedic via RFI <rfi@contesting.com> |
Reply-to: | nm8rmedic <nm8rmedic@rocketmail.com> |
Date: | Wed, 31 Aug 2016 11:58:10 -0400 |
List-post: | <rfi@contesting.com">mailto:rfi@contesting.com> |
Thanks Charlie. Just now I took the time to run the calculation, also. About 5.5 E-3 light-years. Microscopically small. Scott Sent via the Samsung Galaxy Note® II, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone <div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: charlie@thegallos.com </div><div>Date:08/31/2016 11:16 AM (GMT-05:00) </div><div>To: transistor <transistor@charter.net> </div><div>Cc: rfi@contesting.com </div><div>Subject: Re: [RFI] SETI </div><div> </div><snip> There is also an estimate that the Starfish atomic test from the early > '60's could be detected in X-ray emissions out 400 AU. Â I haven't done > the math but 400 AU is probably not all that far in light years. 400AU = .006 Light Years, or roughly 10x pluto's orbit - not even to the Oort Cloud 400AU is ABOUT 2 light-days (1 light-day = 173AU) _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [RFI] SETI, nm8rmedic via RFI |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [RFI] SETI, JW via RFI |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFI] SETI, nm8rmedic via RFI |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |