I agree Mike. The toilet water flush reference is way off topic.
The solar-nuclear reference (also off topic from LED bulbs) is a bit closer to
root cause of the problem needing to replace shrinking power generation with
supposedly clean renewables. The more solar systems installed to do this, the
more we'll face new RFI problems next to our ham stations. We could "mitigate"
this new RFI threat through normal means of time and expense normally mentioned
here, or find other creative ways to avoid it's RFI growth no matter the
politics. It's all RFI mitigation or prevention in the end.
73, de ed -K0iL
-----Original Message-----
From: RFI [mailto:rfi-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Michael Coslo
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 1:33 PM
To: Rfi@contesting.com List
Subject: Re: [RFI] led bulbs?
I’m here for RFI mitigation, and not politics. Good day sir.
-73 de Mike N3LI -
> On Sep 30, 2016, at 12:44 PM, Wes Stewart via RFI <rfi@contesting.com> wrote:
>
> It's not shiny new, but I have one a hundred miles or so from me. You would
> have to pave half of AZ with solar cells to equal its output.
> The federal government has no business doing about 90% of what it does. Where
> in the Constitution does it mention how much water my toilet should use per
> flush?
>
> From: Michael Coslo <mcoslo@comcast.net>
>
> The problem of course, is that no one wants that shiny new nuc power plant in
> their backyard.
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|