Randy:
It follows that the operator would be the responsible party, but when
you consider the fact that the Optimizers get their power from the solar
panels, and the only way to shut them off is by physically
disconnecting them, it would appear the responsibility of that part of
the system would fall under the control of the company.
My neighbor said the company owns, maintains and operates the system. He
also said that he is not authorized to operate or make any changes or
modifications. Of course without seeing the written contract, it's all
speculation. I'm hoping I can convince my neighbor to let me have a copy.
Tony -K2MO
On 11/13/2017 3:49 PM, Randy Standke wrote:
The "operator" of the system is responsible for FCC violations. If a
homeowner bought the system, it would be him. If an outside company
operated and maintained the system on a homeowner's roof, it would be that
company. I suspect if a homeowner used a lease strictly as a way to finance
the system, he would be the operator the same as someone who bought it -
since he is the only one who has control of its operation.
Randy KQ6RS
-----Original Message-----
From: RFI [mailto:rfi-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Tony
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2017 12:25 PM
To: rfi@contesting.com
Subject: [RFI] Leased Solar Panels: Operator Responsibility?
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|