|Subject:||Re: [RFI] wireless power transfer near or in the 160M band|
|From:||Jim Brown <email@example.com>|
|Date:||Thu, 8 Feb 2018 12:12:00 -0800|
On 2/8/2018 9:48 AM, Dennis Monticelli wrote:
It costs more money to build a TX loop that suppresses the EM field yet allows the induction field to be as strong as possible and not highly directional (nulls are bad because you don't know where the RX(s) lie). Suppressing the EM field is key for us.
It is at distance, but not if the source is in our near field, or not far beyond it. Like a few houses down the street.
73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||[RFI] wireless power transfer near or in the 160M band, Dennis Monticelli|
|Next by Date:||Re: [RFI] Wireless Power Transfer via 160 Meter Band, JW via RFI|
|Previous by Thread:||[RFI] wireless power transfer near or in the 160M band, Dennis Monticelli|
|Next by Thread:||[RFI] Fwd: Interpretation section finished., Jim Brown|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|