Our efficient home made going to a heat pump impractical. The break
even pay back compared yo our "old" furnace" was close to 50 years,
making the high efficiency heat & air conditioner more economical (The
rebate for the high efficiency with the 2 speed blower was the same as
with the variable speed in MI .) They were willing to guarantee the
variable speed would be RF quiet, "in writing", but I decided to go with
the two speed
73, Roger (K8RI)
On 7/2/2018 1:01 PM, Phil Duff wrote:
From what I saw when we replaced our heat pump system couple years ago the
variable speed controller systems had a higher SEER rating than the standard
controller systems.
Folks trying to save $$ on heating/cooling costs coupled with possible rebates
for higher SEER systems encourages installations with variable speed controller
I suspect.
We stayed with a standard (RF quiet) controller.
73 Phil NA4M
On Jul 2, 2018, at 11:53 AM, Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> wrote:
Why use variable speed controller at all? Most systems that use motor controllers have
2-speed controllers as "standard equipment" and offer variable speed as an
upgrade. I suggest that you try to avoid variable speed.
73, Jim K9YC
On 7/1/2018 11:25 AM, James Jordan wrote:
Other comments or suggestions?
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
-. .- ….- --
Phil Duff na4m[at]suddenlink[dot]net
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
--
Roger (K8RI)
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|