To: | <rfi@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI System |
From: | <wx5l@charter.net> |
Date: | Sun, 18 Dec 2022 13:56:17 -0600 |
List-post: | <mailto:rfi@contesting.com> |
There have been comments that the ARRL has the FCC's ear. Really do they? Recently Jessica Rosenworcel , FCC chairwomen has made a statement about issues with Solar Edge RFI and said that S-6 to S-9 is NOT harmful interference. On what basis can she make that determination. Does she know what an S unit is? Has she been advised from a technical support group to make that comment? The FCC's should not label harmful interference with an S-meters reference. I would be confident to say of there would be s-6 interference to a fire department, ambulance service or aircraft control tower that would not be tolerated but as amateurs we must tolerate it in the eyes of the FCC. Now let the flame throwers commence. 73, Randy WX5L _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi |
Previous by Date: | Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI System, Jim Brown |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI System, Michael Carter |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFI] Trying to avoid Solar RFI, Michael Carter |
Next by Thread: | Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI System, Michael Carter |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |