RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFI] Common Mode Noise?

To: Rfi List <rfi@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RFI] Common Mode Noise?
From: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: jim@audiosystemsgroup.com
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 14:32:26 -0800
List-post: <mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
Again, thanks! I remember reading about that military project, forget where. Great example!
The first times I encountered open wire line were either on a tour of 
the Crosley VOA site by our senior EE class (U of Cincy), or maybe at AM 
broadcast stations, where it is widely used and coaxial to feed 
verticals. I've also seen that coaxial open wire line at commercial HF 
communications RX and TX sites north of San Francisco.
73, Jim K9YC

On 1/22/2025 1:54 PM, David Eckhardt wrote:
Jim, far too many hams solidly believe open wire, parallel conductor XMSN lines, radiates just because it isn't shielded.  Absolutely wrong if care is taken to keep the currents balanced and the phases opposite. They simply do not understand nor want to take the time to understand the rank basics of a transmission line, coax or open wire, or for that matter, G-line.
Nor do they understand that ANY amateur antenna like a dipole is 
UNBALANCED.  Period!  Even Uncle most times can not assure that.  As you 
commented, the local environment dictates unbalance between the two 
sides of a dipole, unless it's in free space.....  How many of us 
absolutely assure homogeneity for a couple of lambda below our 
antennas?  I'll bet none of us hams do, myself included.  But I know how 
to build, measure, and install common mode chokes and use them 
intelligently.  Further, I have never, except for the first three or so 
years I was licensed, "grounded" (earthed) my station.  Three kinds of 
earth connection:  1)  safety (the "green" wire), 2) ESD bleed dump, and 
3) lightning remediation (not direct strikes, but for radiated fields 
from near-by strikes).  Also, realize the typical amateur budget does 
not allow for protection against direct strikes!
When Uncle installed the ported coax around the fissile material storage 
facility on Kirtland AFB in Albuquerque, N.M., he spent millions and 
millions of your and my tax dollars in preparing the surrounding soil.  
Even then it wasn't perfect and quite problematic.
Yes, I use parallel conductor XMSN line for my HF wires (doublet), 
exclusively, except for my vertical which is by design, unbalanced.  
Hams don't get that, either!  How many times have I read the question on 
a number of sites, "Do I need a balun or common mode choke on my 
vertical"?   DDaaaaahhhhh......
Dave - WØLEV

On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 7:35 PM Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com <mailto:jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>> wrote:
    On 1/22/2025 10:43 AM, K9MA wrote:
     > The whole point of using coax is to prevent radiation until the
    RF gets
     > to the antenna. There's no need to further complicate the issue.

    There is no more or less radiation from a 2-wire line than from coax.
    What causes radiation is common mode current, and 2-wire can carry just
    as much common mode as coax of the total antenna system is unbalanced.
    Just as in coax, common mode current in 2-wire line shows up as a
    difference between current in the two wires, taking both magnitude and
    phase into account.

    Antennas can be unbalanced by their surroundings, like variable height,
    sloping ground, nearby conductive objects, imbalance in the termination
    of 2-wire line in the shack, including a poorly balanced tuner or
    matching network.

    73, Jim K9YC

    _______________________________________________
    RFI mailing list
    RFI@contesting.com <mailto:RFI@contesting.com>
    http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi <http://
    lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi>



--
*Dave - WØLEV
*



_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>