RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] 160M is open

To: k4ww@arrl.net
Subject: Re: [RTTY] 160M is open
From: "llindblom@juno.com" <llindblom@juno.com>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 21:29:41 GMT
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Shelby you don't necessarily need a 160 antenna to make Qs on that band.  Just 
ask K4JRB about loading his 40 meter beam with a tuner and making contacts 
during the CQ 160 contests.  During NAQP CW & SSB I typically make a bunch of 
160 Qs and in many of those cases those I work do not have a full size 160 
antenna.  And, as someone else said this is not a good time of year for 160, 
but fall is coming in five months and the band will start to improve.

73 W0ETC

-- "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net> wrote:
"Jim McDonald" <jim@n7us.net> wrote: "160 RTTY in mid-May...are we hard core
or a bit daffy? ;-)"

Well said!!!! I'm not sure that I understand, or need to, the continuing
infatuation with 160 meter RTTY? Having experienced the wrath of the
"frequency guardians" when operating RTTY on 40 meters, between 7030-7050, I
have no desire to disturb those same "guardians" on 160! I would estimate
that less than 5% of all "regular" RTTY contesters, my self included, have
an adequate 160 meter receiving antenna system? Seeing my call being
spotted, during ARRL/CQWW160 CW contests, by European stations that I
couldn't hear, convinces me that my 160 meter receive antenna needs some
improvement? Of course, living on a 100X50 subdivision lot, doesn't leave
much room for 160 meter receive antenna's?

C'Ya, Shelby


_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>