RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] RTTY Screwed by FCC?

To: RTTY Reflector <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] RTTY Screwed by FCC?
From: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 16:40:14 -0700
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
On Oct 14, 2006, at 3:44 PM, Anthony W. DePrato WA4JQS wrote:

>> No, RTTY is a binary (two state) mode, but it is not digital, any  
>> more
>> than CW is.
>
> SNIP
> Bill:
> tell it like it is brother. guess when they lowered the theory to get
> a ticket they just put rtty and cw into that other word so the new
> guys would not get cornfused hi

What hams call "CW mode" is really modulation that uses OOK (on-off  
keying) or ICW (interrupted continuous wave) to pass information  
through an HF channel.  Amateur "RTTY mode" uses FSK as the  
modulation process.

In the presence of noise in the HF channel, both of them can be  
characterized by such things as bit, character and symbol error rates  
(BER, CER, etc).  Analog voice modes are characterize somewhat  
differently (A-weighted SNR is one example).

So, call them whatever you like.   When I write implement the  
decoders for them, I treat them as modes that have discrete symbols  
and therefore optimize the filters, demodulators and slicers with BER  
in mind.  Unless people start calling them discrete signaling modes,  
I will keep calling them "digital modes."

The channel for CW and RTTY is continuous, but the information being  
exchanged is discrete.

73
Chen, W7AY

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>