----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Moore" <wx4tm@tm-moore.com>
To: "John Laney" <k4bai@worldnet.att.net>; "secc" <secc@contesting.com>;
"ACG" <acg@alabamacontestgroup.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 12:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Acg] Chance for Input on Proposed Rule Changes for CQ WPX
Contests
> "QSO alerting assistance of any kind".. I wonder if this will be
> interpreted to include the use of a 2nd radio by single ops?? Does "any
> kind" really mean "any kind"?? Tom WX4TM
>
>
>
> 1. Skimmer. The WPX Contest will follow the lead of the CQWW Contest
> regarding use of Skimmer technology by single operators. The rule will be
> identical to the CQWW Contest:
>
> "QSO alerting assistance of any kind (this includes, but is not limited
> to, packet, local or remote Skimmer and/or Skimmer-like technology,
> Internet) places the entrant in the Single Operator Assisted category."
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Laney" <k4bai@worldnet.att.net>
> To: "secc" <secc@contesting.com>; "ACG" <acg@alabamacontestgroup.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 10:03 AM
> Subject: [Acg] Chance for Input on Proposed Rule Changes for CQ WPX
> Contests
>
>
>> Some rule change proposals for 2009 have been announced on the CQ WPX web
>> site. Please take a look and provide any feedback you may have.
>>
>> Visit http://www.cqwpx.com/blog/
>>
>>
>> Randy, K5ZD
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ACG mailing list
>> ACG@alabamacontestgroup.org
>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/acg
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|