> From: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
> Subject: Re: [RTTY] Best program
> To: RTTY Reflector <rtty@contesting.com>
> Message-ID: <2C5BB00C-94D5-48CF-8D13-E6E353E901A5@mac.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
>
> RITTY was (and still is) an amazing feat, considering that when Brian
> wrote it, I don't believe Johan KC7WW has yet created the first
> amateur HF Channel Simulator.
>
> Unless Brian had access to profession Channel Simulators, he must have
> recorded countless hours of RTTY signals under all kinds of
> propagation conditions to come up with the RITTY algorithms.
>
> 73
> Chen, W7AY
>
>From an end user's perspective, and keeping in mind the unfortunate decision
of K6STI to discontinue the production of his application, Chen, why has no
other PC based application compared? Has anyone contacted Brian and asked
him if he'd consider releasing the information that he used to create his
application so that someone else could pick up his torch?
Like Chen says, we keep hearing about how far superior RITTY is/was. With
the increase in computer usage, power, and knowledge, has no one attempted
to compete with Brian? Dave, would that help you in improving MMTTY? Chen,
any chance of your research being used to develop a PC based application?
RITTY's old, uses antiquated hardware, yet still out performs all modern
apps. We have 10's of times more processing power, higher dynamic range
(higher then the rigs themselves) soundcards, and 10+ years of MORE
experience then Brian did at that time with DSP. What a waste of useful
information, sitting dormant in a DOS based application.
Charlie
KI5XP
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|