Hi Ed,
I would tend to favor a dedicated 160M contest before integrating top band to
existing contest formats. I know for one that I already have a rough time
trying to keep up on 40 and 80M from limited location, I couldn't even start
thinking about figuring out an antenna system (that works) for 160. I think a
good chunk of contesters are in a similar situation and this would probably
just open the gap even more between top stations and ...the rest of us :)
I would give a 160M contest an honest try and see in time how to improve the
setup for more competitiveness. I don't know how many of you regularly
experience unwelcomed behavior on 40M during a contest and if so what would the
reaction be on 160? times 4? Hope not...
My two cents, 73
Fabi va2up
> From: w0yk@msn.com
> To: rtty@contesting.com; topband@contesting.com
> Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:24:57 -0700
> Subject: [RTTY] 160m in RTTY Contests
>
> Most (all?) RTTY contests prohibit operation on 160 meters. Yet, a number
> of RTTY contesters have asked that it be added. I'd like to hear your
> thoughts on this topic, pro and con. In particular, I'm thinking about the
> CQ WPX RTTY and CQ WW RTTY contests.
>
> Ed - W0YK
> CQ RTTY Contest Director
>
> -----------------------------------------------
> Ed Muns
> Muns Vineyard - www.munsvineyard.com
> FaceBook - www.facebook.com/munsvineyard
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_________________________________________________________________
Vous étudiez dans un établissement collégial ou universitaire canadien? Obtenez
Windows 7 pour aussi peu que 39,99 $ avant le 3 janvier! Achetez-le maintenant.
http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9691646
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|