RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] IS0R & 75 baud

To: RTTY Reflector RTTY Reflector <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] IS0R & 75 baud
From: "Scot, K9JY" <scot@k9jy.com>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 13:14:36 -0500
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
None of this will increase the rate...this time. 

But when will the "standard" baud rate ever get deemed as too slow? In the year 
2525?

I'm sure it will tick a whole bunch of people off, but having DXpeditions work 
higher baud rates will perhaps get the mojo going to a higher baud rate as 
"standard." After all, machines are doing all the transmitting and translating; 
it isn't like a person needing to copy 100 wpm Morse code.

Scot, K9JY

On May 10, 2010, at 12:57 PM, WS7I wrote:

> From: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
> 
>> 
>> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 5:58 AM, Jeff Le Fouler - F6AOJ <f6aoj@orange.fr> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> in order to increase qso rate in dxpedition
>>> IS0R will run 75 baud on 20m today
>> 
>> Does anyone really believe that changing to a non-standard baud rate
>> will actually INCREASE rate?  Or will it just increase confusion?
>> 
> You are of course right, Jim.
> 
> 75 Baud RTTY will enable this expedition to work at least 1 QSO per hour.  
> There will be a huge decrease in any foreign contacts as most will not even 
> figure out the 100 WPM speed.
> 
> This is one of the worst ideas to ever surface.  Sort of like working 100 WPM 
> in a RTTY contest.
> 
> I'll let Chen address the phase-shift and polar problems.  But don't use your 
> 250 Hz filters as they won't work!
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>